The ALA Code of Ethics was created in 1939 and has only been amended 3
times since then (in 1981, 1995 and 2008). I am slightly surprised that it has
not been amended more times than that. At work, we are always editing policies
and documents. And every year, clubs on campus have to edit their
constitutions.
Some of the principles of the code are pretty much related to customer
service: “We provide the highest level of service…through…courteous responses
to all requests” and “We distinguish between our personal convictions and professional
duties and do not allow our personal beliefs to interfere…” Unfortunately,
because these relate to customer service, I see them get violated every once in
a while.
There are also rules about how to treat one’s coworkers: “We strive for
excellence in the profession by…encouraging the professional development of
co-workers, and by fostering the aspirations of potential members of the profession.”
I see this rule in play all the time. For years, when I was still writing my undergrad
thesis, the librarians would constantly ask me if and when I was going to go to
grad school to become a librarian. They have done the same with the student workers
if they know the students have interest in becoming a librarian. Almost all my
coworkers are very supportive in this and always tell us if we need help with
something related to school, to just ask them. They also take interest in our education
and ask us how our library classes are going every so often.
In chapter 12 of our textbook, there is a section called “reference
services to the homeless and impoverished.” At my work, we have a very high
homeless population that comes into the library every day (earlier on in the
semester one weekend, they outnumbered the students). For the most part, none
of them cause problems. Some of them we know by name, others just by sight. The
sections talks about how they “have strong body odor, carry all of their
belongings with them, [and] stay in the library during all open hours” (page
346). These are all true (though some are very cleanly). It also mentions how
they are usually problematic or troublesome. Now whereas a few of them
sometimes like to give us attitude (one has a fit if the daily newspaper is not
out at 8am sharp while another gets angry that the computer automatically kicked
him off after 30 minutes), we do not have too many problems. A big part of that
is that if they continually give us trouble, they know that we will call campus
safety on them. Therefore, I do not feel threatened because I could always threaten
to call safety. I just get annoyed with their attitude, especially if they are
not polite (some act entitled to whatever they want), and the smell sometimes
gets really bad. I cannot imagine having to deal with this population in a
public library setting. I think if I were in the public library setting, I
would not feel safe. The textbook says that “there is much overlap between librarianship
and social work” (page 347). I never thought of that before. That as a
librarian, one could provide information to the homeless patrons to help them
better themselves. We do not really do this (usually we just get questions on
how to use email and the other day someone asked me how to look up bus and
train tickets). The problem is that some people just do not want help. But they
also do not really ask us for information. They just come in and go to their favorite
spot where they hang out all day long. I wish there were more that we could do for them.
Interesting comment on the relatively few revisions to the ALA Code of Ethics. I wonder if part of the reasoning behind this is how general it had to be to begin with since it is intended to be an umbrella for such a wide range of institutions. Unlike the policies of an institution, which are specific and need more frequent review, such a general and inclusive framework might be able to stand the test of time a bit better.
ReplyDeleteYour discussion of the homeless populations made the chapter much more real for me. I appreciate how you (and your library) help them maintain their humanity, rather than taking it away for something as phenotypic as smell. Additionally, I agree it would be not only interesting but impactful for librarians to really experiment and learn how you can reach them to help. While I agree some people (not only homeless!) do not want help, it will be our job soon to reach all of those patrons who need our help within our domain and power and are unwilling to reach out or immediately accept our offer for aid. Thank you for bringing up this discussion.
ReplyDeleteI am happy to agree with you that I too see the support of co-workers a great majority of the time in libraries. I also experienced the support my supervisor in my previous job. She always took the time to show me how to do something and also explained why it was done this way. That support really gave me the courage to apply to UMSI.
ReplyDeleteOn another note, I think I agree with Nicco. Every single library is unique yet serves a similar purpose of providing access to information that a general set of ethics is necessary. I also tend to go along with the thinking that "if it isn't broken, don't fix it." In my opinion, these seem to be working and allow for growth with the ever changing world.